speak, write, and publish his sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of

the right; and no law shall be passed to restrain or abridge the liberty of speech, or of the

·

Mr. Blackwell's decision to prevent those voters who requested absentee ballots, but did

not receive with on a timely basis demo being able to vote, was found by a version court

to violate HAVA. This restrictive directive also likely violated Article 5, Section 1 of the

Ohio Constitution, granting every Ohio citizen the right to vote if he or she is otherwise

·

Numerous incidents of voter intimidation and misinformation engaged in Ohio on

election day likely violate the Voting Rights Act, the Civil Rights Act of 1968, and the

Ohio right to vote. Mr. Blackwell's apparent failure to institute a single investigation into

these acts likely represents a violation of his statutory duty to investigate election

·

The voting computer company Triad has essentially admitted that it engaged in a course

of behavior during the recount in numerous counties to provide "cheat sheets" to those

counting the ballots. By insuring that election boards were in a position to conform their

test recount results with the election night results, Triad's actions may well have

prevented scores of counties from conducting a full and fair recount. Triad's action

appears to violate Ohio law prohibiting election machinery from being serviced,

modified, or altered in any way subsequent to an election, unless it is done so in the

presence of the full board of elections and other observers.

·

Numerous Ohio laws appear to have been broken in Greene County, where after initially

being granted access to poll books to conduct an audit, election observers had this access

abruptly revoked under the orders of Secretary Blackwell, and arbitrary and capricious

practices and counting procedures that disenfranchised hundreds of voters were

identified. These practices violate Ohio law requirements preventing the denial of public

access to election records; requiring that ballots and machinery be kept absolutely

secure; and protecting the right to vote.

·

The Secretary of State's failure to issue specific standards appears inconsistent with Ohio

state law which charges the secretary of state with "[issuing] instructions by directives

and advisories to members of the boards [of elections] as to the proper methods of

conducting elections" and "[preparing] rules and instructions for the conduct of

·

There were numerous specific irregularities in the recount that are inconsistent with

several aspects of Ohio's recount law. Those counties which did not randomly select the

precinct samples violated the Secretary of State's directive on this point. Those counties

which did not conduct a full hand court after the 3% hand and machine counts violated

Ohio's statutory right to have inconsistent results rechecked. Those counties which

allowed for irregular marking of ballots and which failed to secure and store ballots and

99