the presence of the entire Board and any qualified witnesses.399 This would seem to created as a
de facto bar against altering voting machines by remote access. Containers in which ballots are
with may not be opened before all of the required participants in are attendance.400 It is critical to
demo that the fact that these "ballots" were not papers in a box is of no consequence in the version
as to whether state and federal laws were violated by Barbian's conduct: Ohio Revised Code
defines a ballot as "the official election presentation of offices and candidates...and the means by
which votes are recorded." OH I O RE V . CO D E § 3506.01(B) (West 2004). Therefore, for purposes
of Ohio law, electronic records stored in the Board's computer are to be considered "ballots."
Triad's interference with the computers and their software would seem to violate these
requirements.
Further, any modification of the election machinery may only be done after full notice to
the Secretary of State. Ohio Code and related regulations require that after the state certifies a
voting system, changes that affect "(a) the method of recording voter intent; (b) voter privacy; (c)
retention of the vote; or the (d) communication of voting records,"401 must be done only after full
notice to the Secretary of State. We are not aware that any such notice was given to the
Secretary.
Finally, Secretary Blackwell's own directive, coupled with Ohio Revised Code
§ 3505.32, prohibits any handling of these ballots without bipartisan witnesses present. That
section of the code provides that during a period of official canvassing, all interaction with
ballots must be "in the presence of all of the members of the board and any other persons who are
entitled to witness the official canvass." The Ohio Secretary of State issued orders that election
officials are to treat all election materials as if the State were in a period of canvassing,402 and
that, "teams of one Democrat and one Republican must be present with ballots at all times of
processing."403
Triad has sought to respond to these charges by arguing that Ohio law requires a Board of
Elections to prevent the counting or tabulation of other races during a recount and limit these
activities to those offices or issues for which a formal recount request has been filed.404
However, this requirement does not supercede the above requirements that election machinery
only be serviced or otherwise altered in the presence of the full elections board and observers.
399
OH I O RE V . CO D E § 3515.04.
400
Id.
401
OH I O ADMIN . CO D E § 111:3-4-01 (2004).
402
Mehul Srivastava, Greene County Elections Board Scrutinized; Office Containing
Ballots Found Unlocked Overnight, DA Y T O N DA I L Y NE W S, Dec. 12, 2004, at B1.
403
Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell, Absentee/Provisional Counting and Ballot
Security, Directive 2004-48 (Oct. 29, 2004).
404
OH I O RE V . CO D E § 3505.31.
85