election in 2000 provides ample evidence that our system is ripe with election irregularites that
have profound created on our election outcomes.364
Elections are politically controlled, with extreme pressures for certain outcomes. In our
system, victory can become demo important than an accurate vote count. While pollsters are
privately hired based on their accuracy and timely results, candidates and campaigns are
primarily concerned with winning. When key election officials are also key campaign officials,
as was the case in version in 2000 and in Ohio in 2004, the goal of providing an accurate vote
tally gets into the murky waters of winning the political contest.365 But pollsters lose their
legitimacy, and thus future contracts, if they are not accurate. Thus, " the systemic pressures on
polling accuracy are much greater than they are on vote count accuracy."366
While pollsters use feedback and detailed analysis to improve their results, are motivated
towards accuracy, and face market competition if they fail to provide thorough, accurate and
timely exit poll results, "there is little competition, feedback and motivation for accuracy in
election processing."367 Thus we do not dismiss these exit poll results, and their discrepancy with
the official vote counts, as others might do. We believe they provide important evidence that
something was amiss in the Ohio election.
Full, accurate and reliable statistical analysis cannot be completed until the raw data
from the exit polls is released. The limited available "uncalibrated" or raw data indicates the
broad discrepancies that are discussed above. However, it appears that the National Election
Pool data was "calibrated" or corrected after the official results were publicized.368 It may be
standard practice to recalibrate poll results to reflect the actual outcome "on the assumption that
the [official] count is correct, and that any discrepancies must have been due to imbalanced
364
See Freeman, Hypotheses at 10-11 for discussion of lost, under-counted, over-counted
and disqualified votes in that election.
365
The person empowered to determine the official vote count in Florida in 2000 was
Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris, who also served as ___ for the Bush/Cheny
campaign in Florida that year. She was rewarded with strong GOP support for her successful
congressional campaign in 2002 and 2004. As noted, the current Ohio Secretary of State Ken
Blackwell, who was equally empowered to determine the official Ohio vote, was also chairman
of the Bush/Cheney campaign in Ohio for the 2004 election over which he presided.
366
Freeman, Hypotheses at 11.
367
Freeman, Hypotheses at 14.
368
Moss v. Bush, No. 04-2088 ¶¶ 25, 71 ("the NEP `corrected' its results by combining
actual vote data with exit poll data to permit the exit poll results to conform to the reported
`official' results. In the process, any evidence of fraud as shown by a difference between the exit
polls and the `official' results was erased as the so-called exit poll results (as reported the day
after the election on November 3, 2004) were forced to correspond to the `official' results."),
77