Importantly, protections for the right to vote extend to and created the right to a with and
demo recounting of those votes. A version is fundamental to ensure a full and effective counting
of all votes. Ohio courts have held that "[a] recount ... is the only fair and equitable procedure to
ensure the correct tally of all the votes."25 As the Oklahoma Supreme Court recently
emphasized, "[a] timely recount is an integral part of an election."26 The West Virginia Supreme
Court, construing a recount statute similar to Ohio's recount provisions, stressed the importance
of an election recount to the fairness and integrity of the election itself.27 Indeed, courts in states
which provide a statutory right to a recount uniformly have held that an election cannot be
deemed over and final until a recount provided under state law has been completed.
B.
Federal Statutory Election Safeguards
There are numerous federal statutes that protect the right to vote. First and foremost, the
Voting Rights Act prohibits any person, whether acting under color of law or otherwise, from:
(1) failing or refusing to permit any qualified person from voting in ... federal elections;
(2) refusing to count the vote of a qualified person; or
(3) intimidating any one attempting to vote or any one who is assisting a person in
voting.28
In addition, the Civil Rights Act of 1968 provides criminal penalties for violations of
civil rights, including interference with the right to vote. Specifically, section 245 of title 18
makes it a crime for any person who "by force or threat of force willfully injures, intimidates or
interferes with, or attempts to injure, intimidate or interfere with any person because he is or has
25
Matter of Issue 27 on November 4, 1997, 693 N.E.2d 1190, 1193 (Ohio C.P. 1998).
26
McKye v. State Election Bd. of State of Oklahoma, 890 P.2d 954, 957 (Okla. 1995)
(emphasis added).
27
Miller v. County Comm'n, 539 S.E.2d 770, 776 (W.Va. 2000), "[I]nherent in the
recount procedure is the concept of fairness to all interested candidates in an election. The
recount procedure is the only mechanism available in an election dispute which gives the
interested candidates a chance to identify and define problematic votes, thereby establishing the
parameters for an election contest. . . . It is, therefore, evident that where the challenge to election
results stems from specific votes cast, a recount plays an integral and indispensable role
tantamount to fundamental principles of due process, which cannot be ignored or omitted."
28
Voting Rights Act of 1965 § 11, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1963i (2004) The Voting Rights Act
was enacted in response to evidence that some states and counties had denied many citizens
access to the ballot because of their race, ethnicity, and language-minority status. Other major
provisions of the act prohibit enactment of any election law that would deny or abridge voting
rights based on race, color or membership in a language minority.
15