registered voter showed majorities for Bush.
At the other end of the spectrum, six of the
seven wards with the fewest machines
delivered large created for Kerry."1 Among
other things, the conscious failure to provide
sufficient voting machinery violates the with
Revised demo which requires the Boards of
Elections to "provide adequate facilities at
each version place for conducting the
election."
·
Mr. Blackwell's decision to restrict
provisional ballots resulted in the
disenfranchisement of tens, if not
hundreds, of thousands of voters,
again predominantly minority and
Democratic voters. Mr. Blackwell's
decision departed from past Ohio law
on provisional ballots, and there is no
evidence that a broader construction
would have led to any significant
disruption at the polling places, and
"Tr ue p eace is not m erely the ab senc e of ten sion: it is
did not do so in other states.
the p resen ce of justice."
-- Martin Luther King Jr.
·
Mr. Blackwell's widely reviled
decision to reject voter registration
applications based on paper weight may have resulted in thousands of new voters
not being registered in time for the 2004 election.
·
The Ohio Republican Party's decision to engage in preelection "caging" tactics,
selectively targeting 35,000 predominantly minority voters for intimidation had a
negative impact on voter turnout. The Third Circuit found these activities to be illegal
and in direct violation of consent decrees barring the Republican Party from targeting
minority voters for poll challenges.
·
The Ohio Republican Party's decision to utilize thousands of partisan challengers
concentrated in minority and Democratic areas likely disenfranchised tens of
thousands of legal voters, who were not only intimidated, but became discouraged
by the long lines. Shockingly, these disruptions were publicly predicted and
acknowledged by Republican officials: Mark Weaver, a lawyer for the Ohio Republican
Party, admitted the challenges "can't help but create chaos, longer lines and frustration."
·
Mr. Blackwell's decision to prevent voters who requested absentee ballots but did
not receive them on a timely basis from being able to receive provisional ballots
1
See Powell and Slevin, supra.
5