Woman says she was harassed by family man Schwarzenegger for two days to come to his trailer to have sex with him
By Jackson Thoreau
Arnold Schwarzenegger, family man who remains loyal to his
four kids and Kennedy-clan wife.
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Republican hypocrite and woman chaser
who gives Bob Packwood and Newt Gingrich and Bill Clinton and JFK a run
for their money.
I choose the latter depiction. Or perhaps one in the middle,
but closer to the latter description.
It's not just the stories of an alleged Schwarzenegger extramarital
affair published by the New York Post, National Enquirer and other media
that appeared to have caused him to drop out of the 2002 California governor's
race.
It's also an anecdote I was recently told by a source. A
woman - a family member of this source - worked behind the scenes on a
weekend shoot in one of Schwarzenegger's movie's years ago. He harassed
this woman for two days about having sex with him in his movie trailer,
my source says.
She tried to politely say no, but Schwarzenegger kept persisting,
insisting she come to his trailer during a break. The woman tried to joke
it off, saying at one point, "But Arnold, what about Maria?" He laughed
and said, "My driver is very discreet."
At the same time, Schwarzenegger also made inappropriate
comments to the younger wardrobe girl, commenting about her behind when
she bent over to pick up something, my source says.
After the first woman had not completed the trailer rendezvous
by the end of the weekend, Schwarzenegger drove by her in his car. With
his bodyguards around him, Robot Man shouted her name and yelled, "I can't
believe you pussied out on me!"
So why should I believe this source? For one thing, my source
was told the story years ago, so it has nothing to do with Schwarzenegger's
sudden candidacy for governor. For another, this is not the only such
story floating around out there about Robot Man [another story concerns
a carrot and a woman from Brazil]. And finally, "pussied out?" Doesn't
that just sound like something the man who made "pump up" a catch phrase
would say?
I'm not going to reveal my source or name names. The woman
involved doesn't deserve to be harassed over this. I really don't think
keeping her name out of it makes the story less believable. Where there's
smoke, there's fire. Right, Kenneth Starr?
And what goes 'round comes 'round. Right, Packwood, Gingrich,
Henry Hyde, Bob Barr, Joe Scarborough, Name Your Favorite Republican Hypocritical
Marital Cheater?
So why should I care if the Republican candidate for governor
of California is a hypocritical adulterer? Isn't that only the business
of Schwarzenegger and Maria and God, as we Clinton defenders said during
the Monica days? Man, how I long for those good ol' days, when most of
us had good-paying jobs and 401Ks that rose in value and no fear of a
nuclear war and our most pressing problem, according to much of our media,
was whether Clinton lied about getting a blow job.
If Schwarzenegger wasn't hypocritically campaigning as a
good family man, taking Maria and the kids with him on campaign stops,
I might give him a break. If he was running for mayor of Brentwood, not
the most populous U.S. state with the most electoral votes in the life-and-death
2004 presidential race in which we HAVE to kick Bush out of the White
House, I might cut him some slack.
If we knew something about what Schwarzenegger might do
as California governor, I might back off. If Schwarzenegger would - or
could - tell us his vision for the state or speak about exactly how he
will solve California's earthquake-sized budget woes, I might stop writing
right here.
If Bush racketeer Rove hadn't cynically and secretly engineered
this recall after their guy, Richard Riordan, lost in 2002, I might keep
my nose in Texas. You really think arch-conservative Rep. Darrell Issa
wanted to drop out of this race after spending $2 million of his own bucks
to get the damn recall election?
You really think Riordan just decided on his own not to
run, especially after Schwarzenegger burned him by giving him indications
he might not run and lied about how they both supposedly worked together
to maintain suspense? You really think people like former Gov. Pete Wilson
just happen to become this political neophyte's campaign co-chairman?
For more on this White House link to the recall campaign
and Schwarzenegger's entry, see http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2003/08/06/MN114924.DTL
and http://www.buzzflash.com/analysis/03/08/08_recall.html. Read the article
on recall proponents and representatives of potential Republican candidates
meeting at the Los Angeles office of Gerry Parsky, Bush's top California
adviser, to discuss the effort [Associated Press, July 30, 2003]. Read
about Bush's endorsement of Schwarzenegger [San Jose Mercury News, August
8, 2003] and Laura Bush's press secretary, Noelia Rodriguez, helping Riordan
assemble a possible campaign team [Los Angeles Times, July 31, 2003].
Bush and Rove are lying again when they say they have nothing
to do with the California recall. Just like they are lying about having
no involvement with the plan to redistrict Congress in Texas to gain more
Republican seats there - Rove has even met with Republicans in Texas about
it - after they were heavily involved in the Colorado Republican redistricting
power grab earlier this year. I don't believe one damn thing a Bush administration
official says. They just care about increasing their own partisan political
power and couldn't care less about most Americans, except when they want
their votes. But these power grabs can backfire - New Mexico Democrats
are among those discussing redistricting power plays of their own.
Add to all that how many in the mainstream media are already
comparing Schwarzenegger to that other Hollywood actor who became California
governor and a nightmare of a president, and we have to stop this guy
- now.
Back in the 1960s, if some media types had slammed Reagan
with all those stories of extramarital affairs that were swirling around
then, perhaps we would not have come so close to nuclear Armageddon in
the 1980s. Perhaps we would still have federal grants helping to pay for
middle-class students' college costs. Perhaps we wouldn't be paying for
a bloated military that plays policeman all over the world and wouldn't
have such an astronomically high federal debt. Perhaps we wouldn't have
as many as 71 million Americans without health insurance [talk about a
crisis - what are the so-called "compassionate conservatives" doing about
that besides taking more bribes from big insurance companies and healthcare
lobbyists?]. Perhaps we wouldn't have to suffer through an airport named
after Reagan and idiotic talk about putting his mug on Mount Rushmore.
But most reporters steered clear of politicians' private
affairs back then. They also cared more about what average Americans really
thought. Still, I wish some reporters would have risked their public personas
and jobs and exposed the affairs of Reagan back then. I would have - had
I been older than grade-school age.
Even after what Republicans did to Clinton in these tell-all
days, many people - even Democrats whose party is on thin ice these days
- have advised me to lay off the reporting on Republicans' sex lives.
As if reporting on those affairs and abortions and other hypocritical
acts somehow debase me. Perhaps in a way, they do, but I don't give a
damn. If my mud-slinging helps some Republicans fall on their swords,
people can call me whatever the hell they want. Unlike many conservatives,
I can take the hits as much as I dish them out.
I'm merely the messenger, pointing out how hypocritical
those Republicans and the mainstream media were to continually publicize
Clinton's affairs and Condit's affairs while downplaying or ignoring Hyde's
and Scarborough's. In this sex-crazed environment, I'm trying to provide
some balance, something few are doing on this issue. I'm trying to show
that Republicans have extramarital affairs about as often as Democrats.
You think that's obvious? Think again. Why do so many people
and comedians like Jay Leno still joke about Clinton's affairs? Why don't
they still tell jokes about the affairs of the former Republican Senator
Packwood, who had at least 29 women - mostly Senate and campaign employees
- accuse him of sexual harassment and in some cases assault? Packwood
makes Clinton look like a marital saint, yet Leno and others still act
like Clinton is the only politician out there who has ever chased a woman
who was not his wife.
Why don't they target Gingrich and Hyde and Bush and Reagan
and, yes, Schwarzenegger? Because thanks to the conservatively-owned mainstream
media, most people instantly equate Democrats with affairs more than Republicans.
And when they get in the voting booth, that image affects Democrats negatively.
As much as many Democrats want this issue to just go away, it's not going
to until they start fighting fire with fire.
Hey, you ask, can't we just hit Schwarzenegger with the
issue-driven story that he voted for a 1994 ballot measure to deny social
services to illegal immigrants? Voters approved the GOP-backed Proposition
187, but some wiser judges rightly ruled the callous measure unconstitutional.
Surely Schwarzenegger will lose votes among Hispanics if
that continues to receive wide publicity. And it can't help that Pete
Wilson, the architect of Proposition 187, leads Schwarzenegger's campaign.
You and I might care, but the average voter who mostly gets
news from the boob tube and reads newspapers for the sports or TV guide
does not. Republican leaders like Rove understand this - that's why he
pushed so hard to get a popular actor on his side. I'm not sure Democratic
leaders understand this, or else they would have recruited someone like
Martin Sheen, who plays a much more believable president on The West Wing
than Bush does, to run against Schwarzenegger.
So I have to slam Schwarzenegger with all I have, including
the alleged affairs, the reports of sexual propositions, the "pussied
out" comments. Put a story on TV that Schwarzenegger is facing many questions
of extramarital affairs, and that could have some impact on what swing
voters do.
This is that important. If you don't have the stomach for
such mud-slinging, fine. A few years ago, I might have stayed in my ivory
tower myself, believing in some political la-la land where being right
- or left - on important issues really wins out.
But not these days. Not after the Starr Report, the $100
million in public funds to investigate Clinton's private life that Republicans
spent, the hijacking of the White House in 2000, and all the damn dirty
deals since. Now, I'm fighting the Republi-Thugs by giving them a dose
of their own medicine. Now, I'm not pulling my punches.
And hell yes, it feels good. When I read all those emails
from hypocritical conservatives who idiotically call me a Communist and
worse [one of my favorites was the Bush-supporter who said he had a "special
oven" for me and my "Commie butt-buddies" - I love it when Republicans
claim not to be fascists, then use Nazi imagery] for simply turning the
tables on them, it just makes my day. Hell yes, it feels real good that
I can get their goats.
I might not play the political game this way for the rest
of my life. But right now, we are in a crisis. We are in a war against
the Republi-Thug terrorists, not just the Al-Qaeda ones who we once trained
and financed. And we HAVE to win, by most any means necessary - I'll not
resort to physical violence.
That's why I started a petition to "totally recall" Schwarzenegger
just in case he wins. If that disaster occurs, I will forward the petition
to the California State Democratic Party and hopefully someone there will
have the gumption to turn the tables on Bush and Rove and Robot Man.
To sign the petition, go to http://www.petitiononline.com/schwarze/petition.html.
More than 500 people already have signed it in the first few days.
Finally, to those who chided me for mentioning Schwarzenegger's
Nazi father and Austrian background, check this article on his ties to
Nazi Kurt Waldheim: http://www.msnbc.com/news/949666.asp?0cv=CB20.
I could have been harder on Schwarzenegger. I will
have to work on that….
|