| |
|
by Roland X |
|
|
|
Last week saw some of the most serious Democratic infighting
-- and Republican glee -- of the primary season, as the Democratic nominees
tore into one another. There were some unfortunate noises about whose
supporters would go where.
Fortunately, it looks like everyone's back
on the reservation:
DEAN: Sure, this is to all the candidates.
I have repeatedly said, because we've got to beat George Bush, that I
will vigorously support the nominee of the Democratic Party. And I will
vigorously encourage all my supporters to do the same. I will campaign
for the Democratic nominee of this party, should it not be me.
And I'd like to find out who on this stage agrees that
they will pledge to vigorously support the Democratic nominee.
(LAUGHTER)
(APPLAUSE)
The laughter and applause came when every candidate
in attendance (Clark and Sharpton were absent) raised his or her hand. You
can see the video on C-Span's website
on their 2004
Vote page. Sure, a hand or two may have come down pretty fast, but overall
it was a wonderful moment. Dean took a chance to take a shot at another
contender and turned it into a chance for Democrats to show their unity.
The others rose to the occasion admirably.
This was a moment the party needed, and an attitude that
all the candidates need to sustain. While moments in the debate certainly
got rough, there was a renewed focus on Bush. Statements along the lines
of "your plan will be better than Bush's, BUT..." made a welcome return.
Damning with faint praise (and saying someone's better than Dubya certainly
qualifies) is a quite reasonable tactic for a primary, even one of this
importance. It reinforces the point that while all the candidates consider
themselves better choices than the others, any of them would be better
than what we've got.
And that is a message of overwhelming importance
to all the candidates right now. Eventually, one of them will be the nominee,
and the others will have to either support that nominee or find new jobs.
Rove is already planning attack ads based on statements by some of the
Democratic candidates, which is a bad sign. That the Republicans feel
secure in publicly gloating over their opportunity to do so isn't any
better.
We have to expect the process of nominating a presidential
candidate to be vigorous, even bruising at times. As many members of the
current crop have mentioned, the general election is shaping up to be
the most vicious, brutal campaign in recent (if not living) memory --
and the Democrats haven't even started voting in the primaries yet. Whoever
carries the standard for the party is going to have to stand up to incredibly
savage attacks and a singularly unfriendly media environment. That's going
to take one tough customer.
Handing the Republicans ammunition, however, is simply
beyond the pale. There is quite simply no excuse for it, and it's good
to see the candidates themselves realize it (even if it took grassroots
pressure to send the message). Let's hope the fight stays relatively clean
through March, because when April comes along we'll need our hip-waders.
By then, we'll know who the Democratic nominee is -- and so will Rove.
(/) Roland X |