It's About Time We Get You Guys Off Welfare
Obviously, disabled vets are faking it
“It’s about time we got you guys off
welfare.” That’s what I was told by a good loyal supporter of this
Bush/Cheney war of choice in downtown
I had just left the rally in support of Cindy Sheehan and was on my way home, and those yellow ribbons just really hit me wrong. I had read a report that the V.A. was going to “review” 72,000 disabled veterans’ claims who are receiving disability payments for combat related PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome) for “fraud.” In fact, we were talking about that at the rally today as a lot of us that were there are members of VFP-72 (Veterans for Peace) and combat vets; and this affects us directly. The only “fraud” being perpetuated is the one Bush/Cheney have perpetuated on this nation.
Being a disabled veteran myself (Vietnam 1965-67) and an active anti-Iraqnam war activist, those yellow ribbons just over-load my good sense sometimes, I confronted the guy right there in the middle of downtown Portland (which on a Saturday is one very busy place) about yellow ribbons; supporting the troops; what that really means as well as what is being done to veterans by this Bush/Cheney cabal. All he could muster was the “welfare” comment.
But I have heard that same kind of statement before. Just recently, David Chu, at the Department of Wars’ Pentagon, told us all that, “…continued payments to veterans presents a threat to our national security, as it is taking needed funds away from the military…” Chu has oversight of the V.A. budget as it, V.A. budget, now has also got to compete with active duty military family housing, active duty healthcare which Chu also has oversight of.
What’s scary though, is not people like the man I confronted today, statements like that from party loyalists are expected, it’s veterans who still support this madness Bush/Cheney have unleashed. One guy, a Korean War vet in a wheelchair, is still fighting with the V.A. over his healthcare and sporting a pro-Bush pin and yellow ribbon; but he is not the alone.
For the love of whatever you hold dear my “fellow” veterans discontinue your support of, and for those who have lied this nation into war, Bush/Cheney & Co., Inc, and who have total disregard for those who have “borne the brunt of battle”—us veterans; you, me, my friends and your friends—and the kids that have been sent off to Iraq who are coming back to a rapidly vanishing V.A.
I have a very good friend who is
a Chaplin at a V.A. facility. Recently he wrote me in reply to a couple of
questions I asked him. I am not going to give his name or the V.A. he works at
for as I am concerned for him. He is a
“My Friend and brother,
I am well…Hot as hades and the sweat pours like rain. Because I have confronted our director a number of times in the past three years and won (the term winning is suspect) I am on the outside looking in so instead of being proactive, I am forced to be reactive. All of this is said to let you know that I do not get the scoop on anything. All in all, morale is quite low and the deficit and overwork and stretching the dollar to the extreme has people sniping at one another and the distrust is rampant. I try to stay centered and remember what I am about and help people laugh. On a personal level--I am sickened by what our "leaders" are doing and educating any young people I can on the Biblical view of Pacifism--I have stopped watching the news because it is so slanted. Other than that all is well and I am off to…for a couple of days…
Peace and love.”
Congress, while patting each
other on the back for the recent emergency supplemental for the V.A., has
nothing to cheer about. People knew this was going to be the result when an
addition $2 billion for the V.A. was rejected soundly earlier in 2004 when the
2005 budget was being voted on. They knew and didn’t give a damn. If those in
S 1042, the Department of War budget for 2006 was passed by both parties in congress recently. But not before an amendment that would have made the V.A. budget mandatory was removed, and left it as it is now: a year to year discretionary budget item competing with active duty military healthcare and family housing. Take a look below, at what those that pontificate about “support the troops” prevented from being a part of S. 1042—take a look at how much they care about veterans; about those they are turning into veterans who are just now coming back from Iraq, scared in body, mind and spirit.
Also keep in mind that those doing these things, themselves have never served this nation in uniform, with rare exception, let alone ever having seen war up close and personal—and that especially includes George W. Bush and Dick Cheney, “chickenhawks”, one and all.
“Republicans block amendments to provide health care to veterans. Senate Republicans' efforts to stop debate on S. 1042 could mean that the following efforts to support our nation's veterans will not receive consideration:
http://democrats.senate.gov/dpc/dpc.cfm?A=fs&B=109&C=1&D=76
Guaranteeing adequate health care from the Department of Veterans' Affairs (VA). #The May 2003 report of The President's Task Force To Improve Health Care Delivery For Our Nation's Veterans found that "there is a significant mismatch in VA between demand and available funding - an imbalance that...if unresolved, will delay veterans' access to care and could threaten the quality of VA health care." Task Force members supported the creation of a funding mechanism providing guaranteed funding for VA health care each year. Unfortunately, the Bush Administration has opposed Democratic efforts to enact the recommendation of the President's own commission and, as a result, the VA has been drastically shortchanged. Recently, VA Secretary Nicholson testified that the VA may experience a total funding shortfall for Fiscal Years 2005 and 2006 as great as $4.5 billion dollars. To enact the recommendation of the President's commission and ensure that our veterans receive adequate health care, Senator Stabenow has offered an amendment to provide guaranteed health care funding for the VA each year.
Ensuring that
the VA can provide health care for new veterans returning from
Secretary Nicholson testified that an
underestimation of the number of wounded veterans returning from
So, here we are at what it was I
read that so ignited me today when I saw that man and his friends with all their
nice neat little yellow ribbons on their chests. Keep in mind that the majority
of the 72,000 disabled veterans that are under review are
Post Traumatic
Stress: Sticker Shock over Shell Shock
The US government is reviewing 72,000
cases in which veterans have been diagnosed with severe post-traumatic stress
disorder, claiming that misdiagnosis and fraud have inflated the numbers.
Outraged vets say the plan is a callous attempt to cut the costs of an
increasingly expensive war.
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/080905L.shtml
That “civilians” blindly follow under the Bush/Cheney” banner, well, that’s one thing, but for veterans, who are victims of a grossly under-funded V.A. to follow under that Bush/Cheney banner is inexcusable. For to do so is to side against fair and just treatment of your fellow veterans and those who are coming back from the war in Iraq Bush/Cheney sent them into.
We also know that many, an
inordinate number, are coming back from
So much for supporting the
troops; so much for supporting the nation’s veterans.
For more information on just what veterans in this nation are up against and fighting for see:
Vets for Justice
http://www.vetsforjustice.com/
Veterans for Peace Chapter 72
http://www.dunckleystreet.com/vfpchapter72/
Send this article to a friend Printer-Friendly Version
More articles by this author, Jack Dalton
Jack Dalton is a disabled Vietnam veteran, activist and independent writer that lives in Portland, Or. He has a blog, Jack’s Straight Speak and is a columnist for the POAC as well as many other web publications.











